Released: June 20th, 2014
Rated: R
Studio: Warner Bros.
Starring: John Lloyd Young, Erich Bergen, Michael
Lomenda, Vincent Piazza, Christopher Walken
Directed by: Clint Eastwood
Written by: Marshall Brickman, Rick Elice
Personal Bias Alert:
Didn’t see the musical,
never heard of The Four Seasons
4.7 of 10
Any
discussion of American cinema in the last 60 years would be incomplete without mentioning
Clint Eastwood. He’s played such a
prominent role and outlasted so many others that he has ingrained himself into
the very idea of American cinema. With
roles like the Man with No Name and Harry Callahan, Clint’s the only man who
could arguably equal John Wayne’s iconic portrait of masculinity. Then again, he’s never shied away from
prominent, strong roles for women, either.
His directorial efforts include “Sudden Impact,” “The Bridges of Madison
County,” “Million Dollar Baby,” and “Changeling,” starring Sondra Locke, Meryl
Streep, Hilary Swank, and Angelina Jolie respectively. His work has touched upon nearly all genres
of film, earned millions of dollars, and won nearly every award
imaginable. That he’s still making
movies, and still pushing himself in new directions, is a reward to film lovers
everywhere.
Now
Clint’s made a musical before. He stared
in 1969’s “Paint Your Wagon,” but hasn’t ventured into the genre since. “Jersey Boys” marks his return, directing the
adaption of the hit Broadway musical of the same name. It claims to tell the story of the pop group
The Four Seasons, but it’s more focused on the group’s lead singer, Frankie
Valli. This confusion is emblematic of
the film, which never quite grasps a point.
What
struck me most while I was watching it was how odd the structure was. It lays out the story with little regard for
arcs, often relying on one of the band members to turn and explain to the
audience a plot point or their feelings.
The musical, I later found out, is structured into four parts, one for
each member of the band. I now realize
that the film was structured this way as well, with only one band member
addressing the audience at a time. This
was not obvious while I watched it, hence it failed to give any structure to
the meandering plot. Also confusing was
its sense of passing time. The film
would jump forward, but the date in which it landed wouldn’t be obvious. Then at one point, for no particular reason,
we jump back two years. The rest of the
story is told completely linearly, which makes this backward jump seem awkward
and out of place.
Younger
audience members such as myself will likely be unfamiliar with The Four Seasons
(I had never heard of them) and will only recognize their most famous
hits. With no vested interest, the film
really had to sell me on why these guys were interesting. Did they have a really messy start? Were they plagued by personal flaws that
tragically drug them down? Were they
particularly talented musicians/performers?
The answers are no, no, and sort of, which isn’t enough to make an
interesting film. The men all grew up in
Jersey, and in movie world, if you’re of Italian decent in Jersey, then you
have ties to the mob. They do seem to
have had some loose associations, but it never gets them into too much
trouble. The personal flaws that are
brought up are stale: one has a gambling
problem and several struggle to keep their families together during their long
absences on the road. It’s also explicitly
stated several times that only two of them are really talented, and guess what? Those are the two who survive in the
industry. It really does bring into
question why these guys deserve their own musical. To be honest, it seems to have been a money
play. Bob Gaudio, an original member and
the songwriter of the group, had the musical made. The movie gives the impression that he and
Valli own the songs, and I’m guessing that part of the story’s true.
The
reason this film isn’t a total bust lies in the obvious effort of everyone
involved. It was a flawed project from
the start, but you get the sense that Clint, the actors, the crew, and even the
writers did their best. Costumes,
makeup, and set design are all spot-on and are often the only things that help
the audience navigate the changing time periods. The writers manage to get in some
laugh-out-loud jokes; I mean, with the name The Four Seasons, how do you not
make a Vivaldi joke? Then there’s the
actors, who portray their thin characters as well as they can. But it’s Clint and cinematographer Tom
Stern’s work that elevates this into watchable territory. They’ve worked together since 2002’s “Blood
Work,” and no other filmmakers working today use light and shadow like they
do. They have a penchant for lighting
one side of an actor’s face, letting the shadow of their hair and nose streak
across the other side. Here, they use
soft lighting along with other techniques to evoke the time period. It looks beautiful, so even when what’s
happening onscreen isn’t very interesting, it is pleasing to look at.
As
a nice bow on the end of this meandering film, it just stops, without anything being
resolved or wrapped up. This is my best
impersonation of it.
Other Notes:
Ø Several
plot elements, like the girlfriend and the daughter, aren’t given enough screen
time to make an impact.
Ø John
Lloyd Young, who played Valli, was far too old to play a teenaged version of
the character. I was completely confused
as to why everyone was treating a 30 year old man like a kid at the beginning
of the film.
Ø When
did the daughter decide she wanted to be a singer?
Ø It’s
a respectable failure. Keep swinging,
Clint.
No comments:
Post a Comment