Released: October 22nd, 1999
Rated: R
Studio: Fox Searchlight
Staring: Hilary Swank, Chloë Sevigny, Peter
Sarsgaard, Brendan Sexton III, Alicia Goranson, Jeanetta Arnette, Matt McGrath
Directed by: Kimberly Peirce
Written by: Kimberly Peirce, Andy Bienen
Personal Bias Alert:
thinks Hilary Swank is
amazing at a very particular kind of role, not familiar with the true story
8.3 of 10
Everyone
knows someone like Brandon. That
optimistic, bubbly personality radiates off them, and simply being in close
proximity perks you up. They dream and
speak of the dream as if it’s something they’ll do tomorrow. Even if you know they’ll never end up doing
it, those dreams always seem a little closer when they’re around. I don’t know if this is something writers
Kimberly Peirce and Andy Bienen gave to Brandon or if their research on the
real-life man made him out to be this way.
Either way, it serves as an excellent congealer for this rough, complex,
and loving story.
Set
in Falls City, Nebraska, the film follows trans man Brandon Teena (Hilary
Swank) as he finds a new group of friends and falls in love with a local girl
named Lana Tisdel (Chloë Sevigny). The
city itself is captured as one of those small towns with few things to do and
even fewer opportunities to leave. I
have no clue if that’s how the town really was, but I do know that it was named
for a small waterfall that no longer exists.
It’s not hard to imagine a town that’s lost its namesake as a pretty
forlorn place.
Brandon’s
big personality provides a spark to the otherwise listless group of friends
that includes Lana, Candace (Alicia Goranson), and Tom Nissen (Brendan Sexton
III). The story takes it time getting to
know the group and its self-appointed leader, John (Peter Sarsgaard), a
recklessly enjoyable imp. What the film
doesn’t waste its time doing is in setting up the inevitable conflict between John
and Brandon. In Lana’s introduction, she
sings a boozy karaoke song, and a shot holds on Brandon and John sitting
side-by-side, each blissfully enamored and entirely unaware of the other. It’s an untenable situation that ends in a
graphic, nasty way. To be clear, the
last 40 minutes of this film is a tough watch.
The
preceding time, though, is largely a love story, portraying Brandon and Lana’s
budding romance. Swank and Sevigny have
great chemistry, and the flush of their romance is the most palpable aspect of
the film. What makes both of their
performances great, and what won Swank her first Oscar, is that they first and
foremost portrayed their characters.
They didn’t get distracted by the issues the film brings up, but instead
focus on what makes their characters tick, what makes them upset, and what
ultimately makes them fall in love.
Their performances are equaled by Sarsgaard, who unfolds John’s
personality in an immaculately even way.
He’s tragic in and of himself, unable to handle losing the family he has
built in his head.
Despite
a wonderfully told story, a few small missteps hold it back from being a
masterpiece. Some technical problems,
like an awkward lighting change after a character is shown turning off a lamp, jolts
you out of the film. The music is often
too prominent, and the cinematography takes some risks, occasionally stumbling
on its more ambitious attempts. The film
thrives on its slowing building story, which makes these jolts all the more
detrimental.
It
would have been easy to make this film about intolerance, to paint the locals
as ignorant hillbillies, and send the audience home with a message about acceptance,
but “Boys Don’t Cry” does something much richer. It tells a timeless story of ill-fated
lovers, and in doing so makes you see them how they see themselves, as a boy
and a girl, destined to be separated.
Other Notes:
Ø I
criticized the music, but Nina Persson and Nathan Larson’s version of “The
Bluest Eyes in Texas” is perfect. I
can’t hear that song without thinking about this film.
Ø The
line where the sparks fly: “Someone
walked me home last night. I think it
was you.”
Ø The
line that reassured me they were going to land the ending: “There was never any Memphis, was there?”
No comments:
Post a Comment