Showing posts with label two. Show all posts
Showing posts with label two. Show all posts

Saturday, August 22, 2015

Sinister 2


Sinister2Poster.jpg

Released:  August 21st, 2015
Rated:  R
Distributor:  Focus Features
Starring:  James Ransone, Shannyn Sossamon, Robert Daniel Sloan, Dartanian Sloan
Directed by:  Ciarán Foy
Written by:  Scott Derrickson, C. Robert Cargill
Personal Bias Alert:  haven’t seen Sinister, was the only person at my screening

1.5 of 10






            What do you do when a film makes $77 million on a $3 million budget?  Make a crappy sequel, of course!  The only surprise here is that it took three years for Blumhouse Productions to release Sinister 2 after churning out the second Purge movie in only a year and all three Insidious chapters in just four.  Small budget franchises are the studio’s bread and butter, and while you can’t fault them for their profitability, you can take them to task for their quality.  Even so, Blumhouse films normally have a respectable amount of trashy scares and cheap tricks, which makes Sinister 2’s utter ineptness all the more disappointing.

            As with its predecessor, Sinister 2 follows a twisted version of the boogeyman as he lures a child into his violent clutches.  This time he targets a mother and two sons who’re hiding from an abusive husband.  They’ve taken refuge in an abandoned home that is, of course, the location of a previous boogeyman murder, which draws the deputy from the first film in to investigate.  The mother and deputy’s lives mix, the jerk dad starts coming back around, yadda yadda yadda.  The plot of this film is clear from the beginning, made all the more clunky by exposition-filled dialogue that sputters from the actors’ mouths with all the realism of a poorly sewn mermaid baby.  The first film is allegedly rather surprising, and while this one does have one decent twist, everything else in it is so trite that any thrill that might’ve come from this lone offering is suffocated by the surrounding fog of stupidity.

Oh, and that’s not even the most remarkable failure this film has to offer.  What’s more surprising is its inability to build any sort of tension.  Not only is it entirely lacking in the sort of overarching story tension that propels a film to its climax, but also in the momentary tension you should feel before a jump scare.  Director Ciarán Foy has ruined the complaint that jump scares are easy music builds and camera holds, because he flubs them so often in Sinister 2 that you start to question if he was even trying for them at all.  But if these false starts were intentional, then you’re left wondering what the hell was supposed to be scary in the first two-thirds of this film.  The wooden ghost kids?  The unimaginative snuff films?  The god-awful framing?  To be honest, the film’s failures were the only things that had me cringing, particularly throughout a scene where two characters sit on a swing set and their faces are constantly obscured by the chains on the swings.  Perhaps this is just a failed stylistic choice, you ask?  There’s also the scene in the kitchen where the mother is in the exact middle of the frame, blatantly breaking the rule of thirds and making the composition annoyingly unbalanced.  None of these off-kilter shots do anything to build a sense of unease and seem to only be examples of awful filmmaking basics in an equally terrible film.

By the time Sinister 2 drags into its climax, you’ll be begging for these characters to get sliced and diced just so you get something for your money.  It’s another disappointment, though, as the antique-style camera footage (a tension-sucking gimmick the film insists on using) and lack of thought is more apt to leave you laughing than jumping.  Given how stupid the characters are, how vague the boogeyman’s is, and how little actually happens in the final scenes, it’s questionable whether writers Scott Derrickson and C. Robert Cargill were really trying at all.  A more lame, slap-dash conclusion (and entire film) is difficult to find.  You won’t leave the theater happy after seeing Sinister 2.  Do yourself a favor.  Don’t buy the tickets in the first place.

Other Notes
Ø  I laughed out loud when they showed what previously happened in the house.
Ø  At one point a kid pees his pants out of fear, and it looks like a faucet was running from the bottom of his pants leg.  How did a stream of water supposedly make it all the way down his jeans without being absorbed by the fabric?
Ø  This film is rated R, which means they didn’t pull off a single moment of horror when they had however much gore, language, and crazy images at their disposal as they could imagine.  Everyone involved should be ashamed.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Ted 2


Ted 2 poster.jpg

Released:  June 26th, 2015
Rated:  R
Distributor:  Universal Pictures
Starring:  Mark Wahlberg, Seth MacFarlane, Amanda Seyfried
Directed by:  Seth MacFarlane
Written by:  Seth MacFarlane, Alec Sulkin, Wellesley Wild
Personal Bias Alert:  haven’t seen Ted, not a big MacFarlane fan

3.5 of 10





            Seth MacFarlane has been a staple of American pop culture for over a decade now.  His television series and movies have filled our screens almost nonstop, and while the output is impressive, the variety has been lacking.  His television series, which at one point took up half of Fox’s Animation Domination, have been largely criticized for their similarity, especially when it comes to characters.  My only firsthand knowledge of MacFarlane’s work has been Family Guy, which I watched and enjoyed 10 years ago.  Now having seen Ted 2, I have to throw my support in with those who cry uniformity, because Ted 2 is up to the exact same tricks Family Guy was pulling ten years ago.

            MacFarlane’s humor is still a manic mix of bawdy crudeness, pop culture references, and randomness that often gets unfairly criticized for being dumb.  There’s nothing dumb about the amount of jokes and references he can cram into a piece, nor is it, as others have asserted, an unfairly offensive brand of humor.  It’s a completely fair brand of offensive humor, riffing and finding disgust in almost every type of human being.  Rest assured that Ted 2 will hit on whatever your particular sensitivities are, be it homophobia, sexism, racism, nerdism, or dumbism (I’m making up words now, but you get the point).  In these moments, you’ll squirm with discomfort and your blood will boil, but later on your even-keeled head will recognize that he was tearing down pretty much everyone, and I guarantee that you’ll have belly laughed at several potentially offensive moments.

            No, the problem isn’t that MacFarlane’s humor is undeserving of praise; it’s the package it comes in that’s often its downfall.  That’s the case with Ted 2, which suffers from an overlong, disjointed plot.  It should have stuck to the main storyline where the magically sentient teddy bear named Ted (voiced by MacFarlane) must fight for legal human rights.  Instead, the film gets distracted by subplots and offshoots and an annoyingly long setup that makes the whole thing feel disjointed.  Despite its very clear goal, the whole movie seems aimless, wandering around from joke to joke in a way that distracts from the main plot and inhibits you from getting all that invested.  The sad thing is that MacFarlane does seem to be trying to make a tongue-in-cheek point about human rights, but any weight that might carry gets lost in all the meandering.

            The one subplot that does work in the film is the romance between Ted’s best friend John (Mark Wahlberg) and his lawyer, Samantha (Amanda Seyfried).  Seyfried can do broad comedy in her sleep (we’ve all seen Mean Girls), and there’s good chemistry between her and Wahlberg.  The relationship also gives Wahlberg something to do besides pal around with Ted, where he often hams things up too much, and lets him be the jovial idiot his character is supposed to be.  If the rest of the offshoots had been cut, Ted 2 could’ve been a lean, mean, laugh-inducing machine.

            But MacFarlane likes his offshoots, which here mostly exist just for a joke instead of any real plot point.  He was doing this stuff ten years ago in Family Guy, and the same rule applied then as it does now:  if the joke’s funny, then the diversion is worth it.  Unfortunately, too many of the inconsequential jokes in Ted 2 fall dead flat, and it’s not just an issue of personal taste.  Entire scenes would pass in my screening where the theater was quiet enough to hear crickets, including three people who were clearly MacFarlane fans, because they guffawed at every joke that landed.  Even these folks were silent for far too long, and the buildup of these long dry spells suffocated the occasionally riotous moments.

            The barometer for straight up comedy films will be different for everyone.  If you’re someone who evaluates them purely based on the number of times you laughed, then this film will probably be much more satisfying to you.  It undeniably will make you laugh many times, but I happen to value sustained comedy more.  A five minute mashup of Ted 2’s best jokes would make for an incredibly satisfying YouTube video, but in the film you must sit through nearly two hours of dullness just for these few laughs.  That’s not a satisfying comedy to me.

Other Notes:
Ø  The CGI for Ted looked very seamless.
Ø  I got the various references, but they weren’t funny.  What’s the point if they aren’t funny?
Ø  I really disliked the music in this.  I mean, that title number didn’t fit in, and most of the song choices were way too intrusive.
Ø  The height of Ted made for some weird shots.  I don’t know if I’ve ever seen so many inadvertent legs and crotches in the frame.
Ø  There was a lot of manspreading from Wahlberg.