Released: February 6th,
2015
Rated: PG-13
Distributor: Warner Bros.
Starring: Mila Kunis, Channing Tatum, Eddie
Redmayne, Sean Bean
Directed by: Andy Wachowski, Lana
Wachowski
Written by: Andy Wachowski, Lana Wachowski
Personal Bias Alert: likes big sci-fi spectacles, likes the Wachowskis
4.5 of 10
Excess. Excess is the Wachowski’s enemy, and they
often lose to it. Their first film, Bound, is known for excess violence, Speed Racer for excess color, V for Vendetta for excess words, and The Matrix Reloaded for excess
raves. By that trend, Jupiter Ascending fits right into their
catalogue, delivering what is a decent story that’s done in by an excess of
metaphors, world building, and general oddities.
Jupiter
(Mila Kunis) is a young, broke immigrant who discovers that Earth is but a
small part of a big, well-populated universe when a rich dynasty she
unwittingly belongs to tries to kill her to protect their inheritance. Saving her repeatedly throughout the film is
Channing Tatum’s Caine, a wolf-human hybrid who spends much of the movie
skating through the air on hover shoes. Did
you notice anything familiar in that summary?
You should, because for all its window dressings, Jupiter Ascending is a tale as old as time: people fighting over wealth. Structurally, it’s laid out like many a classic
fantasy stories where the main character discovers and accepts their newfound
power. And the woman doesn’t really get
to do much beside get saved by a man that she, of course, falls in love with.
Even
with the annoyingly stereotypical gender dynamics, it’s hard to argue that this
plot setup doesn’t work. It’s so
familiar from the first installments of Star
Wars, Harry Potter, and pretty
much every sci-fi/fantasy series that it slides down like butter, easy and
delicious. The problem is, the Wachowski’s
try to cram in so much half-baked commentary and needlessly complex world
building that the whole thing becomes bloated and difficult to swallow. Sidetracks that seem to exist only to discuss
capitalism, predeterminism, and to cause general boredom leaves viewers wishing
the Wachowski’s would just stick in the reel of Ferris Bueller’s advice on -isms
and leave it at that. It’d save everyone
a lot of time and leave a leaner, more sure-fire plot. Plus, we’d all get to watch some of Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.
What
you can’t knock the Wachowskis for is delivering a bad-looking film. The trailer, which has been kicking around
for months after a delayed release, promised fantastical new worlds, completely
realized by two of the best visual directors working today. Jupiter
Ascending certainly delivers, giving viewers a planet-hopping extravaganza
complete with strange outfits, spaceship dogfights, and a flying reptilian/dinosaur
creature. There’s actually many
strange-looking aliens, again a bit too much, but at least the Wachowski’s aren’t
short-changing the visual splendor. It
is, for this reason, worth seeing in theaters without the 3-D. 3-D will only muddle the image of some
crisply rendered CGI, denying you the pleasure of the Wachowski’s meticulous
eye for detail.
Forty
years from now, if I had to sit down with a young film buff and explain why the
hell the Wachowski’s matter, I’d probably show them Jupiter Ascending. It’s not
their best nor their worst work, but it might be the most emblematic of what
they do as filmmakers. They take classic
genre storylines, spruce them up with lavish, slightly over-the-top visuals,
and are never dissuaded from telling stories exactly how they want them to
be. They brush off people like me who
say their movies are too overdone, they invent new camera techniques to achieve
the exact shots they want, and they never pander to Hollywood’s status
quo. It’s important to remember that Jupiter Ascending is a big-budget film
that’s neither a sequel nor an adaptation, an oddity that few can get funding
for in today’s Hollywood. It takes
people like the Wachowski’s, with a firm belief in what they do to make these
kinds of films, even if their films are a bit of a mess, Hollywood would be
a lesser place without them pushing us forward.
Other
Notes:
Ø The
performances were universally solid, even Eddie Redmayne. He delivered exactly what was asked of him.
Ø The
romance between Kunis and Tatum wasn’t given the time to work.
Ø SPOILER
ALERT: Sean Bean doesn’t die.
Does Eddie Redmayne keep that strained voice, like someone is sitting on his chest, through out the movie? And what, Sean Bean doesn't die???
ReplyDeleteYep, Redmayne is very fey in this role. I was very concerned about it after seeing the trailer, but it oddly didn't bother me in the movie. Everything else was so out there that I think it just kinda fit in.
DeleteI think they broke some unspoken rule with the Sean Bean survives thing.