Showing posts with label Dave Bautista. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dave Bautista. Show all posts

Sunday, November 8, 2015

Spectre


James Bond, holding a gun in front of a masked man, with the film's title and credits

Released:  November 6th, 2015
Rated:  PG-13
Distributor:  Columbia Pictures
Starring:  Daniel Craig, Christoph Waltz, Léa Seydoux, Ralph Fiennes, Monica Bellucci, Ben Whishaw, Naomie Harris, Dave Bautista
Directed by:  Sam Mendes
Written by:  John Logan, Neal Purvis, Robert Wade, Jez Butterworth
Personal Bias Alert:  not a Bond fan, liked Skyfall

7 of 10





            This guy.  We all know Bond, James Bond and the cars, women, and martinis that come with him.  We also know Daniel Craig’s spin on the man, and whether you enjoy his dour era, you can’t deny that it’s banked some good money.  Spectre, no matter how well it does, will be hard-pressed to continue that trend, with the production budget inflating to a reported $350 million (for perspective, Titanic cost $200 million and Avengers:  Age of Ultron cost $250 million).  And what do audiences get for all this dough?  Just an average outing, one that delivers exactly what you expect from a Bond film and nothing more.

            This is a disappointing outcome after a promising pre-production.  The return of Sam Mendes as director had many hoping for another series highlight like Skyfall, and many were excited by the more serious duo of Bond girls that were cast.  But instead of pushing the envelope, Spectre falls back to its roots, taking Bond down another secret organization rabbit hole littered with chase scenes and loose women.  It’s hard to fault the film for the first element (these are action films, after all), but the latter is just tiresome, as eye-roll inducing as many of the antiquated trademarks have become.  What would be so wrong, Bond fans, with loosening the formula a bit?  Wouldn’t it be better to allow Bond to become a modern emblem of masculinity instead of the sad, boozy Sinatra impersonator he’s in danger of becoming?

            Series issues aside, Spectre gets so tied up in trying to bring you everything that you want from Bond that the screenwriters fail to add anything special.  It’s as uninspired as a band playing their decades-old hit; they hit all the right notes, but the boredom is undeniable.   There’s no love and care given to the villain, the love story, or even the investigation.  It’s all familiar beat after beat, endlessly referencing Bond’s past in a vain attempt to bring some meaning.  On the page, none of it is menacing or romantic, and any spark that appears is clearly coming from the excellent work of the people trying to bring the shoddy script to life.

            Mendes blew many fans away with his stylish approach to Skyfall, and he continues that gorgeous effort in Spectre.  If the film was being graded solely on presentation, it would earn top marks, with special accommodations going to cinematographer Hoyte Van Hoytema and conductor Thomas Newman.  They provide an example for how to make Bond’s tropes elegant, delivering the thrilling action sequences and extravagant locations we all expect in a modern package.  Care was given to the background activity of every scene, the lighting, and the music cues, culminating in a film that leads you through every obvious beat without being obnoxiously controlling.  They never betray the formula; they just make it the best it can be.

            Craig continues to keep his Bond an arm’s length away from the audience, and you’ll already know if he’s your cup of tea or not.  Monica Bellucci makes a brief and wasted appearance as an age-appropriate Bond girl (woman?), quickly seceding the film to French actress Léa Seydoux.  There are certain things you must do in the main Bond girl role, primarily serving as a seductress, which Seydoux excelled at in the Cannes-winning Blue Is the Warmest Color and in this.  The extra bit she brings is an air of self-confidence, not that of a plucky upstart, but of a woman who’s taken care of herself for a long time.  She does her best at what is the worst-written character in the film, and her energy saves the role from being an outright failure.  The same cannot be said for Christoph Waltz’s villain, not due to any poor effort from him, but from how largely absent he is.  The lack of a proper villain, or even a clear end goal, is the most problematic aspect of Spectre, and even a mustache-twirling Waltz can’t make him seem menacing enough to last.

            It’s lucky that such a cast and crew came together to lift Spectre’s stale script into decency.  Their efforts make it entertaining, a thoughtless but enjoyable ride that we’ve all been on before.

Other Notes:
Ø  I really like Ben Whishaw as Q:  “I’ve got a mortgage and two cats to feed.”
Ø  The intro of Waltz’s character is captivatingly weird.
Ø  As a Bond novice, I needed more of an explanation for the octopus, but I liked all the imagery they worked in.

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Guardians of the Galaxy

The five Guardians, sporting various weapons, arrayed in front of a backdrop of a planet in space.

Released:  August 1st, 2014
Rated:  PG-13
Studio:  Marvel Studios
Starring:  Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Dave Bautista, Vin Diesel, Bradley Cooper, Lee Pace, Michael Rooker, Karen Gillan, Djimon Hounsou, John C. Reilly, Glenn Close, Benicio del Toro
Directed by:  James Gunn 
Written by:  James Gunn, Nicole Perlman
Personal Bias Alert:  not a Marvel Universe fan, likes all the actors


7.7 of 10



            On its face, Guardians of the Galaxy seems remarkably different than the rest of the Marvel Cinematic Universe.  It’s the first release not associated with The Avengers, and it seemingly exists in its own world, populated with aliens, gods, and high-powered weaponry.  I was hoping this would mean a stray from the safe, middle-of-the-road formula the rest of these movies employed, but alas, its breezy humor isn’t enough to cover its conventional plot.

            To say that Guardians is simply a space western would be overlooking a large part of its appeal.   It’s an homage to the genre, a loving reminder of how much fun a shoot ‘em up in space can be.  Think back to 2011’s Super 8.  That film worked not because it was an immaculate rip-off of 1980’s Spielberg, but because it captured a nostalgia for how movies like E.T. made you feel when you watched them.  Guardians captures a similar feeling, even if it does lack the sappiness of my example.  It serves as a reminder of pleasurable romps gone by, and fans of Firefly and Star Wars will find themselves transported back to their first encounters with the genre.

            Nostalgia comes with a fair amount of good-naturedness, and there’s hardly a more fitting lead for that tone than Chris Pratt.  As Andy on NBC’s Parks and Recreation and the voice of Emmet in The Lego Movie, he’s honed an eager, affable personality that goes a long way to making his Peter Quill/Starlord a viable leader for the group of undesirables that become the Guardians of the Galaxy.  He’s not the brightest nor the strongest, but he’s capable and charming.  Plus, he owns his own ship.  Backing him up is a redemption-seeking assassin (Zoe Saldana), a very literal tough guy (Dave Bautista), and a bounty hunting duo consisting of a genetically modified raccoon and a walking tree voiced by Bradley Cooper and Vin Diesel, respectively.

            Pratt’s comedy background comes in handy, as much of the film’s charm is wrapped up in its flippant humor.  Quill’s got a cocky streak, and his unsuccessful attempts at Saldana’s Gamora is mined for some early laughs.  Character flaws, ridiculous situations, and plot expectations are all used for comedy gold, and the silly laughs keep coming throughout the film.  Cooper’s Rocket (the talking raccoon, mind you) is often the smartest creature in the room, and if that doesn’t give you an idea of this film’s comedic style, then I don’t know what will.

            The plot of Guardians can essentially be summed up in one sentence:  There’s an orb, and everyone wants it.  I would love to say that there’s actually more to it, because the fixings that go with it are so delightful, but that would be a bold-faced lie.  To cover this inadequacy, Guardians fills its runtime with a series of roadblocks that the group must overcome, which never feels like it’s building to an actual resolution.  Instead of working towards a clear goal, it’s more like the group stumbles through the situations they find themselves in, making the whole thing feel almost episodic.  The plot machinations are basic, which they poke fun at, but that doesn’t stop me from knowing exactly how each situation will work out and feeling a little bored by it.

            I wish Guardians of the Galaxy backed up its flair with a bit more substance, but in the end it relies too heavily on familiar conventions to pack a real punch.  I chuckled my way through the film, but I could feel it sliding out of my brain as I walked out of the theater.

            Other Notes:
Ø  This is my favorite Marvel Cinematic Universe film.
Ø  I totally called the mom’s gift.
Ø  Why was Drax worthless?
Ø  Why were the Novas trustworthy enough to get the stone?
Ø  Why did we have to be explicitly told that Quill isn’t entirely human?  It was pretty clear in the very first scene.