Released: July 25th,
2014
Rated: R
Distributor: Magnolia Pictures
Starring: Anna Kendrick, Melanie Lynskey, Lena
Dunham, Joe Swanberg, Mark Webber
Directed by: Joe Swanberg
Written by: Joe Swanberg
Personal Bias Alert: hit-and-miss on mumblecore, likes Anna Kendrick
7 of 10
Mumblecore
is quietly becoming one of the biggest filmmaking movements in America, but its
founders reject that there’s any organization involved. Instead, they surmise that the characteristic
low-budget, organic feel is a natural response to mainstream cinema’s swelling
budgets and rote stories. Many of the
founders are already making forays into bigger pictures, with Lynn Shelton,
Mark Duplass, and Joe Swanberg attracting a variety of mainstream actors to
their projects. Despite this shift, Swanberg
has chosen to keep his budgets low and with Happy
Christmas reverts back to a micro-budget style (the film was made for a
reported $70,000) after maxing out at $1 million for Drinking Buddies. How this
is possible with a cast that includes Anna Kendrick, Lena Dunham, and Melanie
Lynskey is a mystery, but it’s one that you won’t bother to consider when
watching the thoroughly enjoyable Happy
Christmas.
As a
hallmark of the subgenre, the film is largely improvised, leaving the plot to
be a loose, shaggy thing that doesn’t go anywhere drastic. There’s a 30ish couple (Swanberg and Lynskey)
with a young baby and a couch-surfing little sister (Kendrick) in need of a
restart. There’s hints early on of
animosity that never quite blossoms. Instead,
the film circles around a story of familial love and responsibility that is
worth the pain. It’s a gentle conflict,
but one that most people will recognize.
It’s refreshing, given the histrionics that come with most films about
families, to find one that captures the calmness of day-to-day operations. There’s annoyance and frustration, yes, but
there’s also an affectionate history and a bond that runs too deep to break.
Another
easy cliché that the film manages to avoid is pigeonholing Kendrick’s Jenny as
a good-for-nothing slacker. She’s
troubled and there’s hints that she’s rebounding from a bad relationship, but
she’s also genuinely interested in her brother and sister-in-law’s life, not
wanting to interrupt it for too long.
Kendrick plays her as someone smart enough to know that she’s intruding,
and her attempts to make herself useful is what staves off animosity. These efforts lead to a sweet relationship
between Kendrick and Lynskey, one that feels genuine and is wonderfully
navigated by the two actresses. They make
it feel as if they wander into the understatedly powerful moments that occur between
these two characters, and given the genre, perhaps that’s what actually
happened.
However,
the style sometimes gets in the way, as almost all of the moments when Happy Christmas stumbles can be traced
back to its mumblecore tenets. The aesthetic
simply isn’t for everyone, and the low-fi camerawork, lighting, and sound
design doesn’t make for an elegant film.
More coverage shots would give the film some energy, and the
lackadaisical plot inevitably leads to some inconsequential scenes. There’s a sense that Swanberg wasn’t out to
make a perfect film but to capture some small moments that aren’t often
observed. This is something he does
quite well, but it doesn’t make for a complete film.
Despite
its shortcomings, Happy Christmas is
carried across the finish line on the backs of Kendrick and Lynskey. Everything about the film quickly fades from
your mind except a few raw and wholly recognizable moments between these two. If that is truly all that Swanberg wanted to
capture, then the mission was accomplished.
Other
Notes
Ø Here’s
hoping that Lynskey gets more starring roles.
Ø I’ve
never taken to Lena Dunham, even here.
Ø Fun
fact: the baby is played by Swanberg’s
real-life daughter.
No comments:
Post a Comment