Released: December 6th,
1996
Rated: R
Distributor: Miramax
Starring: Ralph Fiennes, Juliette Binoche, Willem
Dafoe, Kristin Scott Thomas, Naveen Andrews, Colin Firth
Directed by: Anthony Minghella
Written by: Anthony Minghella
Personal Bias Alert: not a big romance fan, haven’t read the book
6.5 of 10
There’s
little wonder why Miramax picked up The
English Patient when it became available just before filming began. Founders Bob and Harvey Weinstein know how to
set themselves up for success come awards season, and a big, sweeping romance
with World War II as a backdrop practically screamed ‘90s Oscar gold. Epics were in (Schindler’s List, Forrest Gump, and Braveheart took home Best Picture in the preceding years), and
romances would win the next two years (Titanic
and Miramax’s Shakespeare in Love). Upping the prestige factor is the book it’s
based on, which won the Booker Prize and was considered un-filmable by
some. So when an adaptation with an adequate
story and gorgeous visuals rolled into theaters in late 1996, it must’ve seemed
irresistible to the Academy.
Yes, The English Patient walked away with
Best Picture at the 69th Academy Awards, along with eight other
categories that night, but time hasn’t been kind to this film’s legacy. Time wasn’t kind to its characters, either,
as many spend the film breaking down inside an already crumbling monastery. Nurse Hana (Juliette Binoche) has taken
refuge there to care for an unknown dying burn patient (Ralph Fiennes). A series of tragedies have left her convinced
that anyone she cares about will be killed, so isolation with her amnesiac ward
seems like the safest option. Soon other
military personnel join her, including a Canadian operative named Caravaggio
(Willem Dafoe) and a bomb defuser (Naveed Andrews). Each have been ravaged in their own way by
the war and have come to the monastery looking for refuge, which most of them find
through new or remembered love.
The
lynchpin for this entire plot is the amnesiac burn patient, who’s slowly
unwinding memory proves influential on all their lives. It’s also this period, told in flashback,
that gives the film much of its padding.
It focuses on the over told story of a middle-aged obsessive, someone
who’s too single-minded to be very empathetic, which then falls back on melodrama
to make us care. Much could and should
have been cut from this section, as these long breaks from the much richer
goings-on at the monastery becomes frustrating.
The
novel (which I haven’t read) is allegedly a strong piece, perhaps too strong to
fit in a film. Evaluating it strictly as
a film, it felt like writer/director Anthony Minghella focused in on the wrong
aspects of the story. By playing up the
romance, there was less time to flesh out the numerous subtleties that seemed
to be lurking just underneath the relationships, giving the entire film an air
of grandiosity. The actors did their
best to bring these subtleties out, but since the least interesting
relationship is the main focus, most simply didn’t have the screen time to make
a smooth character arc. Also, this is a
story that easily should’ve been an hour shorter, but a character sits on
information that he has no reason to sit on.
While
its epic length may not be deserved, the film certainly delivers an epic
scope. Deserts, minefields, and Italian
rubble are all beautifully captured in wide, lush shots that show off a
generous budget for a prestige film.
Cinematographer John Seale, whose work you’ll be able to see in the
upcoming Mad Max: Fury Road, shows a good eye for framing,
allowing small things to linger in the background or gradually move into view. So while you’re wading through this slow
film, at least there’s something pretty to look at.
In
the end, the various relationships do deliver in a grand, sweeping way that gives
The English Patient an old-school,
momentous feel. That’s doesn’t entirely
make up for how long it takes to get there, but you won’t leave feeling
short-changed.
Other
Notes:
Ø They’re
all struggling to find their way in the world, making maps to cover their
confusion.
Ø This
is the first digitally edited film to win an Oscar for Best Editing.
Ø “Yes
is a comfort. Absolutely is not.”
Ø This
doesn’t hold a candle to 1996’s excellent Trainspotting.
No comments:
Post a Comment