4.5 of 10
Personal Bias Alert: Likes “The Killing,” Not seen the original
“RoboCop"
He’s
part robot, part cop, part regular guy, but the last part isn’t important
enough to be in the title. “RoboCop” is
a big budget remake of the 1987 film of the same name. I understand that film is a classic, but I
wasn’t aware anyone was clamoring for a remake.
Considering how lifeless this one is, I doubt the filmmakers were even
that interested.
Set
in near future Detroit, police officer Alex Murphy (Joel Kinnaman)
unsuccessfully goes after a well-connected gun dealer. The dealer tries to kill Alex, and the
attempt leaves him clinging to life. At
the same time, a massive company called OmniCorp is trying to sell the American
public on the idea that robots can patrol the streets better than cops. It’s worked abroad and made lots of money,
but America is too “robo-phobic” to allow them here at home. Hoping to sway public opinion, OmniCorp offers
to save Alex by making him into a human-robot hybrid designed to act like their
preexisting robot line. Alex’s wife
agrees, unaware that the company is more interested in selling their product
than in saving Alex’s life. Once Alex
wakes up in his new robot body, these differing goals come to a head.
It’s
a pretty dense setup, and as clunky as I think my summary is, the film doesn’t
do it any better. It starts with what
appears to be a slanted news program à la Fox News or MSNBC explaining how
great OmniCorp robots are and how we should use them here at home. They go back to this program multiple times
throughout the movie to swiftly explain plot points, but the segments always
feel separate from the rest of the movie.
Samuel L. Jackson tries his best as the host of the program to keep them
entertaining, but exposition-filled monologues get old fast. Alex’s setup doesn’t fare much better. A series of oddly edited scenes establish
that he’s a good cop and a loving husband/father. Then he’s almost killed and the movie
actually starts.
As
poor as the setup is, the plot never really gets much better. It’s efficient, but often laughable. Characters do dumb things. Themes are explicitly stated. The ending is inevitable. They tried to throw in some twists to keep
things interesting, but they’re either too easy to figure out or too absurd to
make any sense. This is the first
screenplay credit for writer Joshua Zetumer, and it shows. Although I must give him credit for working
in some good one-liners for a little 80’s flair.
The
characters are all either inconsistent or underwritten, really holding back the
few decent performances in the film. Gary
Oldman is the standout as the conflicted scientist who creates Alex’s robot
body, and Joel Kinnaman delivers a solid performance as Alex. Kinnaman also plays a cop on AMC’s “The
Killing.” Having seen both performances,
I feel that he brought a lot from that role to flesh out Alex. Michael Keaton as the CEO of OmniCorp goes
over the top, and I wonder why no one looking at dailies noticed that Keaton
and Oldman seem to be in two different films.
The
look of the film really makes it into something watchable. Its visuals are detailed in a way the rest of
the film isn’t. When we see the
explosion that nearly kills Alex, his body doesn’t just get engulfed in
flames. You can track him as he is blown
off the screen. All the action sequences
are shot with that level of detail, which makes them all the more
thrilling. So as mindless
counterprogramming to all the Valentine’s Day movies, this isn’t all bad.
Oh, and the RoboCop
suit looks really cool.
Other
Notes:
Ø Every
time Alex walked up to his son, I wanted Kinnaman to say “Hey little man.”
Ø The
sounds that the RoboCop suit makes when it moves or when someone touches it was
a nice addition.
Ø Jackie
Earle Haley never gets to play a nice guy.
No comments:
Post a Comment