Showing posts with label Emma Stone. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Emma Stone. Show all posts

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Aloha


Aloha poster.jpg

Released:  May 29th, 2015
Rated:  PG-13
Distributor:  Sony Pictures
Starring:  Bradley Cooper, Emma Stone, Rachel McAdams, Bill Murray, John Krasinski, Danny McBride, Alec Baldwin
Directed by:  Cameron Crowe
Written by:  Cameron Crowe
Personal Bias Alert:  huge Almost Famous fan, didn’t think Aloha could be as bad as people were saying

3 of 10




            There’s a certain fascination that overcomes you when watching this big of a train wreck.  It’s not so much a question of how it happened; movies are big, complicated beasts that can go wrong in more ways than you can count, but there is a sense of wonderment about how the film before you got released.  Someone, somewhere sat back after watching it, locked down the edit, and sent it out as a finished product to their bosses and to the world.  The shame and trepidation that must have enveloped them before hitting that send key had to be overwhelming, because no one can look at the final cut of Aloha and see a competent film.

            Competent, mind you, is a very low bar.  I’m talking about something that has a coherent plot and characters paired with an audio and visual presentation that isn’t off-putting.  That’s bare minimum of what a film should be, and Aloha manages to fail at three of these four things.  The first half is such chaos that it’s sort of stunning because you know the people in front of and behind the camera, can tell that they aren’t phoning it in, and it’s still a complete mess.  The film jumps around without any idea of where it’s going, the characters don’t have clear goals, the dialogue is, at times, nonsensical, the shot composition is occasionally ugly, and there’s jarring edits that interrupt any flow that the film manages to start.  The back half settles into something approaching coherence and gives you hints about what the film was supposed to be about, but irreparable damage has been done and you no longer care.

            What I think the film was supposed to be about is Brian Gilcrest’s (Bradley Cooper) struggle for morality.  As the opening narration explains, he once dreamed of going to space, but circumstances far from his control caused his aspirations to become mired in the dirty business of earning his spot.  After a failure and a long recovery, he returns to Hawaii for a chance to get his life back on some sort of track, and whether he chooses the right or wrong direction seems to be the film’s largest question.  Complicating matters is the love triangle between himself, a serious ex-girlfriend (Rachel McAdams), and his young, overly perky military liaison (Emma Stone).  Setting a story like this in Hawaii and steeping it in U.S. military and native Hawaiian culture is actually kind of genius as the relatively short battle between these two groups have gone down as one of the most corrupt and bullying engagements the U.S. has ever embarked upon (I recommend Sarah Vowell’s Unfamiliar Fishes for an entertaining history lesson).  If put together correctly, this could’ve been a rich film about a man and a country’s struggle to achieve noble aspirations in spite of their old, dishonorable habits.

            Unfortunately, Aloha doesn’t cobble this message together until late in the film, and even then it remains murky.  This is one of the films that got caught up in the Sony hacking incident late last year, with reports surfacing that the film was a mess and had to undergo extensive re-edits.  How bad it actually was to begin with isn’t currently known, but whatever edits they did make certainly didn’t improve it.  The final cut is so nonsensical that entire conversations have no meaning and have nothing to do with what happened in the scene before.  It’s as if they hired someone with brain damage, one of those unfortunate people who can’t remember things for more than 30 seconds, and paid them to edit the film.  Someone like that would probably like Aloha, because for all its shortcomings the cast is still likable and Hawaii is still beautiful.  On a moment to moment basis, the character’s arguments and motivations might make sense and the occasional horrendous shot could be quickly forgotten.  But most of us do have long-term memory, and Aloha is a film that will stay in there for all the wrong reasons.

Other Notes:
Ø  The opening credits roll over two entirely different setups.  One is a music montage over images of Hawaiian culture while the other is Bradley Cooper narrating his character’s background.  Neither go together and the transition between the two is abrupt.  It’s like they had two ideas for how to open the film and couldn’t decide which to go with, so they went halfsies in such a way that everyone lost instead of won.
Ø  The romance doesn’t work.  I have no clue if that’s due to the awful edit or a lack of chemistry.  Your guess is as good as mine.
Ø  I don’t think this film is guilty of whitewashing Hawaiian culture, but Emma Stone’s character is certainly whitewashed.  I still love Emma Stone, though.

Wednesday, December 24, 2014

Zombieland


Poster for Zombieland with subtitle "Nut up or shut up" and movie credits. The four actors appear as a group all holding different weapons.

Released:  October 2nd, 2009
Rated:  R
Studio:  Columbia Pictures
Starring:  Woody Harrelson, Jesse Eisenberg, Emma Stone, Abigail Breslin
Directed by:  Ruben Fleischer
Written by:  Rhett Reese, Paul Wernick
Personal Bias Alert:  likes zombies, likes big set pieces

8.3 of 10






            Historians will certainly mark this time as a period of the zombies.  Okay, that’s probably a bit drastic, but they certainly have become entrenched in pop culture.  Our TV shows, movies, and books drip with gore and entrails, spawning multiple think-pieces about why we’ve latched onto zombies with such fervor and stamina.  But who cares about reading those when you can watch a movie as fun as Zombieland?

            Jesse Eisenberg narrates and stars as Columbus, an awkward, nervous fellow whose ticks have morphed into a set of rules that keep him alive through the raging zombie apocalypse.  His philosophy and the downfall of the civilized world is shown in a nearly flawless opening.  It’s gory, irreverently funny, and always entertaining, doing much of the heavy lifting in such a way that it never feels like a chore.  Not to play this up too much, but I think Zombieland’s opening should be studied for years to come as a blueprint for getting through your exposition with style. 

            Eventually, Columbus meets up with the formidable Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson), whose verve for dispatching zombies is both concerning and undeniably cool.  The sister duo of con artists named Wichita (Emma Stone) and Little Rock (Abigail Breslin) round out the gang, making for a charming bunch that works incredibly well together.  That’s the biggest plus for this movie, since much of the jokes come from their near-constant bickering and bantering.  Your enjoyment of the movie really hinges on whether you like these people together, and I would’ve happily jumped into that car with them.

            Wichita, it turns out, is determined to give her little sister one more day of being a kid at an amusement park called Pacific Playland, prompting the cross-country roadtrip that gives the movie some structure.  It’s a weak goal, something even the characters acknowledge, but it’s a decent excuse to move from one set piece to another.  And oh, what grand set pieces there are.  As great as the comedy is in Zombieland, it’s just as worth watching for its big, playful use of its environment.  Tallahassee and others get creative with the zombie dispatching while chasing the Zombie Kill of the Week title, keeping the action fresh and exciting as they move from place to place.  Then, out of nowhere, you get a raucously joyful sequence of destruction that’s cathartic just to watch.

The weak overarching narrative does make the movie feel a bit episodic, but it still manages to zip right through its brief runtime.  There isn’t an ounce of excess on this thing, throwing action and jokes at you so fast that it’s no wonder it’s become a go-to crowd pleaser since its release.  I’ve never once had someone turn down the opportunity to watch this movie, and I find that the larger the group viewing it, the better it seems.  The laughs role on top of each other and give everyone a litany of quotes and references to pull out in everyday life, keeping this movie at the forefront of your friend’s pop culture playbook.

            All this being said, I’m not blind to the movie’s faults.  The quick pace is helped out by a stack of plot shortcuts and coincidences, and as great as some of the technical work is, particularly the interactive display of Columbus’s rules, there’s some awful voiceover mixing that sounds very tacked on.

            Even when I’m paying attention to these faults, I still have a great time watching Zombieland.  It gets all the important things right, making it an infinitely watchable, and quotable, piece of pop culture.

            Other Notes:
Ø  In case you were wondering, someone on IMDB confirmed that Twinkies are called Submarinos in Mexico.
Ø  “If the girls in your neighborhood are f***ed up little monsters, well, maybe it’s time to stop driving carpool.”
Ø  Let’s take a moment to reflect on how charming Emma Stone is.

Sunday, May 4, 2014

The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)

4.5 of 10

Personal Bias Alert:  Haven’t read the comics, haven’t seen “The Amazing Spider-Man,” likes the cast

            “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” feels like a film battling between what it wants to be and what it’s expected to be.  Modern superhero movies have become dark, character driven affairs with interspersed explosions.  Even the relatively lighthearted Avengers universe is rough around the edges, making their characters prickly and troubled.  Gone are the days when a superhero traded quips with a villain, vanquished him, and went home happily ever after.  The problem is that’s exactly what “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” wants to be, but it exists in a world where audiences would be disappointed by such a simplistic story.

            This lighter tone is especially prevalent in the filmmaker’s interpretation of the Spider-Man/Peter Parker character.  He’s a laidback, friendly hero, which is refreshing in this era.  Other modern superheroes are cool loner types that audiences admire from afar, but this Spider-Man is someone you could fist bump, trade jokes with, and, if he was older, have a beer with.  Andrew Garfield is the perfect choice for this version of Spider-Man.  He’s good at being breezily affable, and it’s hard not to like him.  The other characters are old-school superhero stock:  either sweet, good people or crazy bad guys.  Dane DeHaan’s Harry Osborn is the only one with any sort of arc, but even he’s pretty messed up from the beginning.

            The main baddie is a goofy, derivative character named Max/Electro played by Jamie Foxx.  As Max, he was a lonely, underappreciated Oscorp employee with a crazy obsession with Spider-Man.  As Electro, he’s a glowing blue humanoid with power over electricity.  After an accident turns him into Electro, he stumbles around in a black hoodie trying to figure out what has happened to him, occasionally send out bolts of electricity from his hands.  This I referred to as his “Blue Emperor” faze, because he greatly resembles the Emperor from “Star Wars.”  His obsession with Spider-Man survived the accident, and when he first encounters Spider-Man as Electro, the needy fellow thinks they will be close friends.  Unfortunately, the encounter goes south, and Electro’s love turns to vengeful hate.  His power and control increases, and from then on he becomes a needy version of Dr. Manhattan from “Watchmen.”  All of this would have been fine if there was something about him that was menacing, but ultimately he just felt like a whiny annoyance there to distract Spider-Man from his other more pressing issues.

            These other issues are where the movie falters, overcomplicating the plot and trying to mix in some broody elements that never fit with the rest of the film.  Peter, you see, is having relationship troubles with girlfriend Gwen Stacy (Emma Stone) and best friend Harry Osborn.  He’s also still confused about why his parents abandoned him with his aunt and uncle.  These subplots seem to be there to add in those dark tones audiences have come to expect, but they play out at such different speeds that the tone of the film changes back and forth from scene to scene.  One minute Spidey is bantering with a bad guy, and then two minutes later he’s having a heart-to-heart with his dying best friend.  The shifts started giving me tonal whiplash, and it undercuts what I think the film’s main goal is:  to be a fun Spider-Man movie.

            Considering I’ve spent most of this review complaining about tone, it should come as no surprise that the writing gets pretty shaky.  Writers Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci, and Jeff Pinkner, all alums of J. J. Abram’s various television series, get the story across clearly, but sacrifice quality in order to do so.  Some of the plot points are simply absurd (Harry supposedly never looked up his father’s illness?), some of the dialogue is pedestrian (“I’m really excited about England!”), and the tone issues have already been discussed ad nauseam.  These guy’s careers have been shaky, but this is among their worst work.

            “The Amazing Spider-Man 2” battles with itself throughout, and the end product is a messy, unsatisfying affair.  It’s neither a fun Spidey film nor a modern superhero epic. Hopefully, the filmmakers pick one direction over the other for the inevitable Spider-Man 3, or they will end up with another waste of good talent.

            Other Notes:
Ø  Let’s break down the absurdity of the Harry Osborn subplot even more:  When Harry’s dying father tells him of his hereditary fatal illness, he says that Harry should start showing symptoms soon.  When he does, Harry goes off the deep end and thinks he needs treatment immediately.  Harry’s father made it into his 60s, so I think Harry had some time to come up with a cure.
Ø  Harry’s assistant tells him about a secret department of Oscorp that is off the books.  Harry finds out more about this secret department by pulling up files about it.  Not so off the books, huh?
Ø  Gwen thinks she has this special knowledge about the backup power grid when all she has to do to turn it on is flip the labeled switch.
Ø  Peter refers to Harry as his best friend.  They haven’t seen each other in eight years.  Peter needs better friends.
Ø  This movie would have gotten a much lower score if not for the ending twist.  It’s effective, but probably not good for the rest of the series.